darcydodo: (Default)
darcydodo ([personal profile] darcydodo) wrote2003-06-25 07:11 am

(no subject)

It's all [livejournal.com profile] spazatron's fault, and I've not even met him. But here are my oh-so-amusing lj-slut stats:


darcydodo's LiveJournal Slut Stats
The below percentages indicate what darcydodo has done with the 35 people on her friends list!
met

65.7%
hugged

25.7%
dated

5.7%
seen topless

11.4%
seen naked

2.9%
made out

8.6%
oral sex

2.9%
fucked

2.9%
What are your LiveJournal Slut Stats?
Sponsored via Adult Friend Finder. Keep this meme and others like it checking it out or getting free account! You may meet the match of your dreams!


[identity profile] spazatron.livejournal.com 2003-06-24 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
"i wanna be where the people are
i wanna see, wanna see them dancing"

*sigh* great music choice.

louis

[identity profile] chele74.livejournal.com 2003-06-24 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
So, are these stats increasing now that you're in France? Hmm? Somehow, I suspect that you're a much bigger LJ slut than I am ;)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)

[personal profile] liv 2003-06-25 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
That test is really confused; it gave me stats for kissing and phone sex, which weren't any of the categories on the original form, by moving my ticks around randomly. Plus my friends list is too short and contains the (only) two people I've slept with, so my stats are going to be appalling.

Your stats are quite revealing though: you've made out with someone that you haven't dated, and that someone is on your friends list. This could be a fruitful source of speculation!

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
Your stats are quite revealing though: you've made out with someone that you haven't dated, and that someone is on your friends list. This could be a fruitful source of speculation!

There's an unbounded field of speculation on which I could discourse for hours!

[identity profile] rysmiel.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
Y'know, a lot of this could depend on people having different definitions of these two categories. I mean, I've had more than one serious involvment in my life and I'm married now, but sfaict from quizzing USAn friends about definitions, I don't think I've ever "dated" in my life.
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)

[personal profile] liv 2003-06-25 07:27 am (UTC)(link)
I interpreted dated to mean gone out with as opposed to gone on a date with. Cos the latter really doesn't seem to be a prevalent custom this side of the pond. And because I have a fairly strong inkling that's how [livejournal.com profile] darcydodo was interpreting it, and she's after all American (despite all our best efforts to civilize her).

[identity profile] rysmiel.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
OK. So what the heck does "made out" mean anyway ?
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)

[personal profile] liv 2003-06-25 08:23 am (UTC)(link)
I assume you're addressing that question to Americans, rather than me! Cos that's one thing I never worked out.

When I was going out with an American, I discovered that the language barrier wasn't too bad in general (apart from the fact that I used to get in severe trouble for mentioning that it exists at all). But our sexual slang failed almost completely to overlap.

Make out maps in my head onto get off with, but I'm not at all sure that's right, or if it just got misfiled. And anyway, get off with seems to mean different things to different people (maybe a regional thing?) Lack of precision in these things is really most inconvenient.

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 09:26 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it's a regional thing. I'd say "made out with" was probably meant to be closer to "pulled", but that's also a regional thing.

[identity profile] tzeentch.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I always felt made out with was somewhat equivalent to snogged. Although I guess it usually only applies to the first few times you do it. After that, you're a couple, and it's just kissing.

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I knew what you were referring to. Hence the hack.

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
It certainly seems so.

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
There are also more tick-boxes than categories, and it's hard to see how they line up.

[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com 2003-06-27 09:46 am (UTC)(link)
OK, they've sorted that one out.

[identity profile] mrjonesandme.livejournal.com 2003-06-25 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
Heya, Darcy, it's Ian. This has nothing to do with the content of your post, but I wanted to ask you for suggestions for the 100-books project I plan to begin soon (see my most recent entry.) I also wanted to add you to my list because you rock.