*gulp* Are you blind, girl? She's got a phenomenal figure. As demonstrated on many an occasion in BtVS, as well as recently in FHM (although the corset-thingummies disturbed me slightly). ;)
I don't think so at all, but I've only seen pictures of her. I don't watch Buffy - just looked her up once on the internet to see what Dave M had fallen for! I can't quite explain what I don't like... something to do with proportions.
Well, it's true that she's not got very large breasts, but I'm not going to complain about that! Sadly, I can't find any particularly good pictures to demonstrate.
No, it's not that. Or rather, not precisely that. She just looks too thin, curveless (hips and breasts) for her height. But this is just from pictures - for all I know she could look much better on TV.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 03:12 pm (UTC)I want to know what the distinction between "attractive" and "hot" is...
But seriously, she doesn't have a particularly stunning face nor body - what's the big deal about her?
no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 03:16 pm (UTC)*gulp* Are you blind, girl? She's got a phenomenal figure. As demonstrated on many an occasion in BtVS, as well as recently in FHM (although the corset-thingummies disturbed me slightly). ;)
no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 03:31 pm (UTC)I don't think so at all, but I've only seen pictures of her. I don't watch Buffy - just looked her up once on the internet to see what Dave M had fallen for! I can't quite explain what I don't like... something to do with proportions.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-15 06:38 pm (UTC)