Hee. Take my friend's excellent quiz!

[darcydodo]

52 of 100 vertebrates applaud your efforts! (amphibians/reptiles 59, birds 73, mammals 71)

Congratulations on hopping, slithering, flying, and charging through three hundred and sixty million years of terrestrial vertebrate evolution! If you did well, you may strut in front of your herpetologist, ornithologist, and mammalogist friends like a kingsnake, kingfisher, or kinkajou. (If you didn't do so well, perhaps a legless lizard, yellow-bellied sapsucker, or least weasel would be more appropriate.)

My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 50% on vertebratesavvy You scored higher than 50% on herpsavvy You scored higher than 99% on birdsavvy You scored higher than 99% on mammalsavvy

Link: The Terrestrial Vertebrates Test written by tigupine on Ok Cupid

I had this feeling that I was doing well on birds and mammals and... not so well on reptiles and amphibians. And I was right.

Comments

[liv]

Those are hard! I did very well (>80%) on birds, ok-ish on mammals and fairly badly on reptiles and amphibians. So not too dissimilar to you, really.

[fanlain.livejournal.com]

oh that is just too cute!

Who needs physics after all?

[zdamiana.livejournal.com]

I feel so vertebrate savvy! I scored better than 99% in all four categories!

I didn't feel like I was doing all that well, though. Maybe I was the first one in my age bracket to take the test, or something silly like that.

Otherwise, maybe it is time to go back to my old career aspiration of herpetologist.

Re: Who needs physics after all?

[darcydodo]

I'm thinking it's the herpetology track for you, m'dear....