![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
darcydodoI've finally decided to make a userpic for puzzle hunts. This is a slightly altered version of our new team logo (Scrabble tile-stacking courtesy of mconst).
This post is also in no way a suggestion that![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
lahosken might wish to make an lj account solely for the purposes of reading locked posts that may also deal with puzzle hunts. (You know that you can still comment anonymously if you so desire, right?)
This post is also in no way a suggestion that
lahosken might wish to make an lj account solely for the purposes of reading locked posts that may also deal with puzzle hunts. (You know that you can still comment anonymously if you so desire, right?)
Re: +1 Insightful
Date: 2007-03-15 06:13 am (UTC)Re: +1 Insightful
Date: 2007-03-15 11:58 pm (UTC)People post comments. A subset of people mod[erate] comments up or down by assigning a score (1-5); they can also apply a label such as "funny," "informative," "troll." Any registered user (I think) can meta-moderate to help balance the system--read ten mod scorings and agree/disagree with their accuracy.
One advantage to this system, when it works, which it often doesn't, is that readers can set a "threshold": comments scored below that threshold won't be visible by default. One can still click to access them, but it cuts down on some of the noise. There is a lot of noise, and some interesting signal buried within it (to borrow the Usenet adaptation of ... anyway).